Protesters Are Trump's Next Target
Sources
“Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence (NSPM-7).” The White House, September 25, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/countering-domestic-terrorism-and-organized-political-violence/.
“Designating Antifa as a Domestic Terrorist Organization.” The White House, September 22, 2025. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/09/designating-antifa-as-a-domestic-terrorist-organization/.
Frenkel, Sheera, and Mike Isaac. “Homeland Security Wants Social Media Sites to Expose Anti-ICE Accounts.” Technology. The New York Times, February 13, 2026. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/13/technology/dhs-anti-ice-social-media.html.
Frenkel, Sheera, and Aaron Krolik. “Trump Taps Palantir to Compile Data on Americans.” Technology. The New York Times, May 30, 2025. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/30/technology/trump-palantir-data-americans.html.
Haynes, Kevin. “Big Tech Confirms DHS Subpoenas: Meta and Google Users Targeted Over Anti-ICE Posts.” Inc, February 16, 2026. https://www.inc.com/kevin-haynes/big-tech-confirms-dhs-subpoenas-meta-and-google-users-targeted-over-anti-ice-posts/91303363.
Kovensky, Josh. “Feds Cast About for an ‘Antifa’ That Encompasses All Trump Opponents.” TPM – Talking Points Memo, February 11, 2026. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/antifa-texas-trial-shideler.
Kovensky, Josh. “Guilt by Association: First ‘Antifa’ Case Sweeps Anti-Trump Activists Into One Terrorism Conspiracy.” TPM – Talking Points Memo, February 16, 2026. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/guilt-by-association-first-antifa-case-sweeps-anti-trump-activists-into-one-terrorism-conspiracy.
Kovensky, Josh. “Trump DOJ Files 9/11-Era Charges Against Leftists Across the Country.” TPM – Talking Points Memo, February 3, 2026. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-doj-files-9-11-era-charges-against-leftists-across-the-country.
LaFond, Nicole. “Bondi Won’t Say Who Is On DOJ’s New List Of Domestic Terrorists Besides ‘Antifa.’” TPM – Talking Points Memo, February 11, 2026. https://talkingpointsmemo.com/where-things-stand/bondi-wont-say-who-is-on-dojs-new-list-of-domestic-terrorists-besides-antifa.
Levinson-Waldman, Rachel. “Trump’s Version of ‘Domestic Terrorism’ vs. the First Amendment | Brennan Center for Justice.” Brennan Center for Justice, March 20, 2025. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/trumps-version-domestic-terrorism-vs-first-amendment.
Resist and Unsubscribe. “Resist and Unsubscribe.” Accessed February 16, 2026. https://www.resistandunsubscribe.com.
Sommerlad, Joe. “ICE Observer Lost TSA Privileges after Encounter with Border Patrol, Lawsuit Says.” The Independent, February 9, 2026. https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/minnesota-border-patrol-agent-tsa-b2916845.html.
Transcript
Hi it’s Monday, February 16, 2026, you’re tuned into Why, America? I’m your lawyer friend Leeja Miller in Minneapolis. Border Czar and Elmer Fudd lookalike contest winner Tom Homan has announced ICE agents are leaving our fair city of Minneapolis and only a skeleton crew will remain. And it’s been sunny and 50 degrees here for the last few days. Truly the picture of hope and optimism after a very dark winter. We are all of course still on edge and we will believe it when we see it–many of our neighbors are still living in fear and we are under no illusion that ICE will completely vacate our streets. But just because the surge has supposedly ended, this is Trump we’re talking about. He is not one to go silently into the night. And over the past few months the administration has made it very clear they intend to bend the law to prosecute as many “domestic terrorists” as possible. Tomorrow, down in Texas, a trial begins in which, for the first time, the Trump regime is going to have to provide us with an actual legal definition of “antifa,” something they’ve struggled with. It is also worth closely watching because it is likely an early example of what is about to become really really common under this regime–the full weight of the federal apparatus coming down against people who hold beliefs contrary to the Trump regime’s ideology. We’ve of course already seen this happening over the last year but I anticipate it is going to ramp up.
Numerous protesters here in Minneapolis reported being taunted by ICE officers who said their faces would be added to a database of protesters. That, combined with the federal government’s sweeping attempt to gather as much information about all of us into one centralized database means that not only will it be easier to identify people to prosecute for all manner of trumped up “domestic terrorism” charges, but also that it will be easier to punish those who speak out against the Trump regime in extrajudicial ways that don’t require charges or laws or courtrooms. At least one protester reported having her TSA precheck clearance revoked after being recorded by an ICE body cam. An academic scholar who studies Antifa reported having his plane tickets cancelled mysteriously as he was attempting to board a plane to flee the country with his wife and young children. When the entire federal government is weaponized against a group of people for their beliefs, that can result in revoked federal assistance benefits, difficulty accessing bank accounts, difficulty entering or leaving the country despite being born here, and so much more. And so even though ICE may not be roving the streets of Minneapolis, they certainly gathered troves of data about the wine moms blowing whistles in their Honda civics that I am predicting will result in varying forms of punishment and intimidation to make an example, once again, out of Minneapolis. Today we’re unpacking what that antifa trial in Texas and other Trump tactics, orders, and memos tell us about what’s to come for all of us. And hey if you watch all my videos but you’re not subscribed can you please just hit that little subscribe button–it helps support this channel and is greatly appreciated.
AD
This headline from Inc dot com about this story helped inform my reporting, “‘Big Tech Confirms DHS Subpoenas: Meta and Google Users Targeted Over Anti-ICE Posts.” Using the Ground News browser extension, I can get helpful background information on this publication in one quick glance. To get the big picture, I can click on Full Coverage, which will show me coverage of the same story from publications across the political spectrum.
My partner on today’s video, Ground News, is an app and website that offers tools to help you critically analyze the news you read, providing context to understand the full picture. You can follow along at ground dot news slash Leeja. For every major news headline, and headlines you may have missed, Ground News provides you with information and context, like who owns the publication and how factual it is, to help you determine for yourself what is trustworthy and how to interpret the news. I feel empowered by Ground News by getting well-rounded insight into each headline, instead of relying on a single outlet that might have underlying biases and motivations that I’m not aware of. Ground News also ensures that I never miss a headline because of my own information bubble with its blindspot feature, by highlighting stories that are covered on one side of the political spectrum and not the other. Ground News is transparent about its methodology, how it assesses each story and publication, including how it uses 3 independent monitoring organizations to assess the bias rating for each publication. I genuinely think the world would be a better place if everyone had this much context about the news they read.
Because depending on where you or your family members get the news, you’re going to get very different takes on the same story. And listen I’m not the only one who loves Ground News, the Nobel Peace Center even called it "an excellent way to stay informed, avoid echo chambers, and expand your worldview.”
I’m always really impressed with Ground News and genuinely think they’re a great resource. If you want to stay informed on US Politics and more Subscribe through this QR code or my link below at ground dot news slash leeja for 40% off this unlimited access Vantage Plan. It comes out to $5 a month for unlimited access to ALL the features I’ve mentioned. Thanks Ground News!
First, let’s go down to Texas, where the Trump regime’s first “antifa” trial is set to begin tomorrow. Investigative journalist Josh Kovensky has done a ton of work covering these topics, I’ve linked his work in the sources, which are linked in the description. The charges stem from a July 4th incident at the Prairieland, Texas ICE facility. Protesters arrived dressed all in black at the facility on the 4th of July to stage what they called a “noise demonstration.” They allegedly fired off fireworks, graffiti’d cars, and damaged a security camera. When a local police officer showed up to the scene, one protester allegedly shot the officer in the neck with a rifle. The officer survived, but the shooting immediately escalated the case. Initially, the FBI conducted a raid on the home of suspected organizers, and the search warrant for that raid indicated they were being investigated for assault of a federal agent, damage to government property, and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. By the end of July, federal prosecutors had charged several people with attempted murder of a federal officer and discharging a firearm during a crime of violence. All of those are regular criminal code style charges. Again, this was last July. Then, Charlie Kirk was murdered and the federal government used that as an inciting incident in order to ramp up its rhetoric against progressive ideology or anything that they claim falls under the blanket “antifa” designation.
Charlie Kirk was shot on September 10. By September 25th, Trump had issued two important orders relevant to what we’re discussing today. One designated “antifa” as a domestic terrorist organization–even though legal experts confirm there is no statute or legal definition of a “domestic terrorist organization” – like, that’s not a thing. And the second order is titled Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence, also known as National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 or NSPM-7 for short. Both orders laid the groundwork for what we’re seeing play out today and what we’re likely to see a lot more of going forward.
The way the Trump regime characterizes “Antifa” in the order designating it as a domestic terror organization is completely detached from reality. Actual scholars of antifa movements will tell you there is no central “organization” there is no leadership there is no one organization that calls itself “antifa.” Antifa is short for anti-fascist which, like, yeah same most of us are probably anti-fascist if we were to be asked hey are you pro or anti fascism. “Antifa” is, if anything, an ideology ascribed to by various decentralized groups of activists. And the fact of it being an ideology is deeply important, which we’ll come back to. As the Trump regime would have you believe, though, antifa is a highly organized “enterprise” intent on overthrowing the government through recruiting, training, and radicalizing young Americans to engage in violence against the state. The order then demands that “all relevant executive departments and agencies shall utilize all applicable authorities to investigate, disrupt, and dismantle any and all illegal operations–especially those involving terrorist actions–conducted by Antifa.”
Three days later, NSPM 7 drops on September 25th. This one is more substantial. It directs Trump’s entire group of national security and intelligence goons to quote “investigate, prosecute, and disrupt entities and individuals engaged in acts of political violence and intimidation designed to suppress lawful political activity or obstruct the rule of law.” This includes individuals and institutional funders and employees of organizations that aid and abet the people engaging in said criminal conduct, as well as non-governmental organizations and American citizens residing abroad that help fund and support entities that engage in or support domestic terrorism. It directs the attorney general Pam Bondi to quote “issue specific guidance that ensures domestic terrorism priorities include politically motivated terrorist acts such as organized doxing campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, trespass, assault, destruction of property, threats of violence, and civil disorder.” Many of those activities on the list are not on the list of domestic terrorist crimes–trespassing is usually a misdemeanor, “civil disorder” can be weaponized against any form of first amendment-protected protest–it is taking the definition of domestic terrorism and stretching it to include the types of things that they frequently accuse protesters of engaging in (trespass, destruction of property) despite the fact that according to the Brennan Center quote “under current law, a charge of material support in the domestic context requires that the person being charged have provided support for one of the specifically defined ‘federal crimes of terrorism.’ By contrast, Trump’s order directs federal authorities to investigate the provision of material support to ‘any and all illegal operations.’ This threatens to criminalize a wide range of activity” end quote including participating in protests or providing donations or services to organizations whose ideology the regime may define as “antifa.” If you go to a protest and hand out water bottles, that could be material support for terrorism under this sweeping order.
NSPM-7 also tells the IRS commissioner to quote “take action to ensure that no tax-exempt entities are directly or indirectly financing political violence or domestic terrorism.” Again, under this definition, that would be any non-profit that is assisting to organize any direct actions or protests or resistance efforts, because Trump could slap a “civil disorder” label on it and call it domestic terrorism.
But perhaps the most damning part of NSPM-7 doesn’t require you to read beyond the intro paragraphs. Because they’re not even trying to hide that this entire directive is based around prosecuting activities of people BECAUSE they ascribe to a specific ideology. Section 1 states quote “Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.” The clear outcome of this is that the regime is going to prosecute and slap a “domestic terrorist” label on people based solely on their ideology. Someone trespassing and damaging property who’s a member of a group that upholds “traditional American family values,” whatever the fuck that means, might get a misdemeanor trespass charge, but someone who committed the same crimes but espouses “anti-American” ideals would be called a domestic terrorist for it.
And listen let’s be crystal fucking clear about this–the US government has historically always been highly suspect of the activities of individuals who espouse leftist or progressive ideology. The FBI, the CIA, they have been actively involved in various operations to surveil and intimidate leftist activists since at LEAST the red scare of the 1950s. MLK Junior was actively being surveilled at the time of his assassination and for a long time prior to it. After 9/11 and the passage of the Patriot Act, which gave us our first official definition of “domestic terrorism” that federal surveillance only ramped up. Per the Brennan Center for Justice, the legal definition of domestic terrorism is quote “acts that are dangerous to human life, violate a state or federal law, occur primarily within the United States, and “appear to be intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population” or “influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion.” Domestic terrorism itself is not a standalone crime; instead, the statute sets out over 50 other “federal crimes of terrorism,” such as bombing a building and destroying infrastructure. However, as the definition makes clear, any federal or state crime can be used as the basis for a domestic terrorism investigation if it is “dangerous to human life” and has the required intent.”
And thanks to that increased investigative authority under the guise of the “war on terror” after 9/11 the FBI was able to ramp up its surveillance, which it especially used against antiwar and pro-environmental advocacy groups and, in more recent years, against Black Lives Matter organizers, while failing to investigate white supremacist violence as domestic terrorism. HOWEVER, even with all the surveillance and paranoia of leftist activism on the part of the federal government, even when those surveilled groups committed criminal acts, even related to civil disobedience, they were rarely ever prosecuted for those acts under the domestic terrorism statute. That statute was reserved for the worst actors. Until now. So Trump didn’t invent the idea of overly surveilling leftist activists while right wing terrorists go uninvestigated, but he’s sure saying the quiet parts out loud, and pushing his administration to stretch the domestic terrorism statute beyond how it’s ever been used. This goes to a theme we’ve been seeing over and over again in this regime–anything that was an “unwritten rule” or based on a good faith exercise of the status quo is out the window now. So the fact that we have almost a century of overly permissive surveillance guidelines for the FBI and CIA especially related to leftist organizers but a collective understanding on the part of the DOJ that you don’t abuse that domestic terrorism statute except for the worst most obvious cases means NOTHING in the face of a weaponized DOJ intent on punishing anyone who doesn’t fall in line. Like much of the abuses of this regime, yes they are stretching the law or sometimes completely operating outside the bounds of the law, but in many cases the groundwork was laid long before Trump took office.
So those orders from Trump came down at the end of September, days after the murder of Charlie Kirk. By October, the charges related to the July 4th Prairieland incident in Texas, at first bare bones traditional criminal charges, were changed. Prosecutors began describing the action as the work of an “antifa cell” and characterizing the demonstration as an “ambush.” Charges were increased to include providing material support for terrorism, as well as rioting and use of an explosive. 15 people were ultimately charged with material support for terrorism, seven have pleaded guilty. Central to the government’s case appears to be two different Signal chat groups, the same signal chat service that organizers here in Minneapolis have been using for weeks to track ICE activity. The most damning piece of evidence they have is against the man they’re accusing of being the ringleader, the one they’ve accused of firing the shot that injured the police officer. In one Signal exchange with a group of five other organizers, the man, Ben Song, was discussing bringing guns to the protest–something that is LEGAL in the great state of Texas. At one point, he sent a message saying quote “Cops are not trained or equipped for more than one rifle so it tends to make them back off.” That’s it that’s the tweet. ANd based on that they’re calling him a violent antifa cult leader. At least three of the people charged were not even in that smaller Signal group chat. Instead, they were part of a larger group chat and helped distribute what the federal government described as “insurrectionary materials called ‘zines.’” Zines with such terrifying titles as “Revolutionary Meditation,” “What Does Freedom Look Like?” “Factories Don’t Burn Down by Themselves” and “Satanic Death Cult is Real.” Rachel Moran, professor at the University of St. Thomas Law School, quote “If you are going to be charged for materially contributing to someone else’s illegal actions, you need to mean to support them in those actions, not just abstractly support their belief system.” Handing out allegedly anarchist zines, even ones that advocate for Satanic Death Cults, is protected under the 1st Amendment. In fact handing out pamphlets with whatever random idea you have is as American as it gets like hello Thomas Paine? The fact that after the Texas incident the authorities seized the printing press of the anarchist zine printer tells you all you need to know about the types of first amendment suppressions happening here. These defendants are being charged, some of them, for the sole crime of being a leftist. And the ones who allegedly committed actual acts of violence or vandalism are having their charges increased dramatically to include domestic terrorism because of their ideology. And getting charged with domestic terrorism is a big fucking deal–it can lead to far harsher and longer sentences, and being slapped with a “terrorist” label for the rest of your life is even worse than having a felony charge on your record. Your ability to do ANYTHING, get a job, get an apartment, get a loan, travel anywhere in the entire world, is severely severely limited. It is lifelong punishment even if they don’t lock you up for the rest of your life or give you the death penalty.
But federal prosecutors in the Texas case are having a hell of a time coming up with a definition of Antifa that doesn’t make it crystal fucking clear that the trumped up charges are completely based on the ideology of the protesters. “At a hearing in the case last year, a federal prosecutor suggested that antifa is primarily concerned with opposing the Trump administration. The federal prosecutor asked a testifying FBI agent if antifa is “really kind of an anti-President Trump and anti-ICE movement; is that right?”
“Yes,” the agent replied. “We’ve seen that rhetoric and terminology in many of their demonstrations.”” At a recent probable cause hearing an FBI agent quote “described antifa as ‘loosely organized,’ ‘a decentralized anarchist mindset,’ and an ‘ideology.’ ‘It’s an ideology that these people believe in, and those who self-identify as it practice this in a lot of aspects of their life,’ he said.” “That, in turn, raises deeply troubling questions. It suggests that FBI agents in the case may be regarding adherence to what they imagine as antifa as itself worthy of investigation, conflating belief or association with criminal conduct.” Add on top of that the conflation with criminal conduct and “domestic terrorism” based on the accused perpetrator’s alleged ideological beliefs and it’s hard to see where the Trump regime’s persecution of leftist activists, protesters, news commentators, lawyers, and more would ever end. And the regime’s activities in recent weeks indicate they may be ramping up efforts to collect information against protesters and activists to be used against all of us either in criminal prosecutions or in less obvious intimidation and other efforts to suppress our rights.
Tom Homan has said he wants to create a database of information on protesters. All members of Congress seem comfortable with the idea of increasing ICE funding so they have more money for body cameras that will collect more protester data–I made a whole episode about how body cams won’t save us, you can watch after this. AI data company Palantir has signed numerous government contracts and is reportedly working to create a large searchable database across agencies, creating the infrastructure needed to track us and to punish us for our movements. Your face appearing on an ICE officer’s body cam could then be compiled with your tax information, your demographics, info on your voting record, your travel, your jobs, info on your federal and state benefits, all the info that has traditionally been spread out across the federal government, very much on purpose because it’s a huge fucking security risk of all that info is neatly compiled in one place–all of that info could be weaponized, and reports indicate the federal government might already be doing this in more isolated incidents, including a protester here in Minnesota who claims she lost her TSA precheck and global entry privileges after a confrontation with a border patrol officer who claimed he had identified her using facial recognition technology and was recording her with his body camera. She was following the officer in public as part of her work monitoring her neighborhood for ICE activity. Which, for the record, is not a crime. She was not charged with anything, she was not arrested, she just got a letter a few days later saying her TSA precheck and Global Entry had been revoked.
And this week the New York Times reported that the Department of Homeland Security has sent out hundreds of subpoenas in recent months to Google, Reddit, Discord, Facebook, and Instagram requesting identifying information connected to accounts that posted anti-ICE content, criticized ICE, or pointed to the locations of ICE agents. These are administrative subpoenas so they are not signed by a judge they are issued by the Trump-aligned DHS, and tech companies get to choose whether or not they comply. When questioned, many of the companies claimed they give users a 10-14 day window, saying hey we’ve gotten this request, if we don’t hear from you in 10 days with a copy of the lawsuit you file against DHS for this subpoena, we’re going to give them your information. The regime claims they’re just doing this to protect their ICE agents from harm, but this is 100% a coercion and intimidation tactic to quietly let posters know that they are being watched. Of course it’s going to be fucking terrifying if Facebook is like hey DHS is asking for all your info and we’re going to give it to them unless you, as an individual, sue the federal government in court within 10 days. And of course when individuals DO actually sue the federal government to block them from enforcing the subpoena, they immediately withdraw the subpoenas before a judge can issue a ruling. Because a ruling from a judge saying hey this is illegal you have no reason to need access to this info or suspect this person of a crime, then that creates precedent that makes it easier to sue DHS for all of its future subpoenas, or could lead to a judicial order barring these types of subpoenas altogether. So DHS flies under the radar by rescinding any subpoena request the second there’s a lawsuit. But it still gets the point across–not only are we going to prosecute people more harshly depending on their ideology, we’re also going to target you and watch you and punish you for your social media posts. And they’re doing this to immigrants of course, all of this, but these latest tactics indicate they’re doing it to everyone, regardless of immigration status. And we knew they’d do this, we’ve been saying it since Project 2025 dropped–this doesn’t stop with immigrants. When one group is denied due process rights that can spread to all of us. When one group’s first amendment rights are restricted that can spread to all of us. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing now.
Okay so what can we do. The one thing about all of this is that we’re a big fucking country. There aren’t enough federal bureaucrats around to subpoena and prosecute all of us. The movement on the ground just in Minneapolis involved literally tens of thousands of people, including thousands in various decentralized highly protected signal chats across the city. They truly cannot prosecute everyone involved, it’s not possible. If you DO get a subpoena warning from a social media company and challenge that subpoena in court, it will likely go away very quickly. Reach out to your local ACLU chapter to chat with a civil rights attorney who may be able to give you advice or direct you towards someone who can.
For the rest of us, they’re collecting all our data, just assume that. But make it as hard as possible to do so. Obviously wear masks when protesting and cover identifying marks like tattoos. Additionally, I am a huge advocate for opting out of all the ways they are collecting both our data and our money. Professor Scott Galloway who hosts a number of popular podcasts is calling for a large scale economic boycott especially targeting tech companies and other businesses that are enabling ICE. It’s called resist and unsubscribe, resist and unsubscribe dot com. Just so we’re clear I’m not affiliated with Scott Galloway in any way, I do not align with him on everything and generally find him to be unlikable but I DO like this specific initiative. On resist and unsubscribe dot com they have a really clearly laid out list of subscription-driven consumer tech companies that are aligned with Trump or are enablers of ICE, with direct links to unsubscribe from them or ways to avoid giving your money or data to them. I found it helpful and I used it to unsubscribe from YouTube TV and Microsoft Office. I’d already unsubscribed from all Amazon services. I would also add Spotify to the list of companies to stop giving your money and data to, I switched to Tidal music. And TikTok is now partially owned by Larry Ellison, one of the worst billionaires on the planet, so I no longer use TikTok. I also deleted Instagram. I’ll post there still occasionally because people follow me there and I want to get this information out, but I don’t give them my money or my data by scrolling for hours. And now when I do download instagram for some random thing I am IMMEDIATELY reminded how much I hate it–once you wean yourself off these platforms it is a horrific shock to the system when you dip a toe back in, I highly recommend it. I do agree with Scott Galloway’s assessment that Trump doesn’t give a shit about votes or our anger or the media or the courts but he has backed down when faced with economic resistance to his policies. And so the way we use our money and, especially, taking back our PRECIOUS TIME from these data guzzling social media platforms, is a powerful tool in our toolbelt for resisting the regime. It’s of course not the only thing, but if all you can muster today is clicking a couple links to cancel that Paramount plus subscription, that would still be huge. I’ve also been thinking about going analog–I have a substantial record collection but also like bring back CDs honestly, they’re good quality and cheap as dirt these days. The other night my family did a movie night and we dusted off the old DVD collection and picked out a movie and it was so cozy and nostalgic feeling it really caught me off guard. Not everything in life can be analog, but there are ways to stop giving over your money and your data to these big companies who don’t deserve our hard earned cash or a moment of time from our one wild and precious life. Comment below if you’ve taken any actions to disengage from these companies.
If you’d like to support my work consider joining on YouTube, Substack, or Patreon to get access to all these episodes completely ad free. Also if you like my Reagan Ruined Everything tshirt you can get one for yourself at leeja miller merch dot com. Thank you to my multi-platinum patrons Christopher Cowan, Evan Friedley, Marc, Sarah Shelby, Dennis Smith, Art, David, L’etranger (Lukus), Thomas Johnson, and Tay. Your generosity makes this channel what it is, so thank you!
And if you liked this episode, you’ll like my episode from last week about all the possible ways Trump is going to undermine the midterms this year.
